Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerhard Calitz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 09:40, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Gerhard Calitz

Gerhard Calitz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, no reliable sources, not a single Google News hit. The given references are either broken or they don't mention Calitz. The Wayback Machine indicates they weren't reliable to begin with. Was prodded, prod removed by author without improvement. Huon (talk) 10:26, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:34, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:34, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:34, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

• Delete - and strongly consider a block for this user. He is not here to collaborate - he has no interest in learning how Wikipedia works or even the most basic rules we have. ~Charmlet ^-talk- 16:56, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

• What is your evidence for that? All I can see is a contributor who hasn't yet learnt all the ins and outs of notability guidelines and deletion procedures, but nothing to suggest lack of interest in learning. Maybe it's you who have lack of interest in learning our basic rule on how to behave towards inexperienced contributors. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:29, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

• Delete No evidence of notability. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:05, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.