Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd and Penguin
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:23, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Todd and Penguin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can find no evidence that this webcomic has received any coverage from independent reliable sources. As far as I can tell the bulk of the article is original research (The Themes and character interactions and Evolution sections) and the rest is effectively a plot only description. Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not states that "Wikipedia articles should not exist only to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers" and topics should be treated in an "encyclopedic manner" - without any third party coverage this will not be possible. The general notability guideline gives significant coverage by reliable sources as the criterion for a topic to warrant an independent article whilst the specific guideline for web content states that "primary sources alone are not sufficient to establish notability" - this topic appears to fail on both counts. Guest9999 (talk) 20:41, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this webcomic. Joe Chill (talk) 22:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Ditto, nothing is turning up in a Google search. Warrah (talk) 02:31, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Hiding T 11:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sign of any independant sourcing. Edward321 (talk) 17:08, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.