Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tortallan Fiefs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Tortallan Fiefs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Relates only to a sub-set of a fantasy world. If it could be integrated into Tamora Pierce, that would be fine. Wholly unreferenced and mostly a list of names. Fails WP:BOOK Velella Velella Talk 21:50, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Tamora Pierce or Delete. Obviously non-notable and unreferenced and fails WP:BOOK. Vacation9 22:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No independent notability as a set of fictional places. The material is just detailed trivia and is not useful for any sort of merge. -- Whpq (talk) 14:34, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 03:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Tamora_Pierce#The_Tortall_Universe - Detailed Google News and Google Books searches provided nothing useful and only books authored by Tamora Pierce herself aside from one exception here. There is no evidence to suggest any of this has been used in other works to be considered notable. Like most cases, the article is entirely in-universe and there aren't any significant third-party sources (excluding, of course, forums and fansites). SwisterTwister talk 23:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 02:20, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 26. Snotbot t • c » 07:50, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 04:11, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence of WP:SIGCOV in independent sources. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.