User contributions for Transcendent28
A user with 290 edits. Account created on 7 February 2011.
19 July 2022
- 08:5508:55, 19 July 2022 diff hist +193 Beast Man I tidied up some of the facts surrounding the "Fighting Foe Men" concept story by Don Glut. This was not the original idea of the character line up, but an early pre-mini-comics story created by him. I added a reference for the prototype "Tree Man" name.
17 October 2019
- 03:2103:21, 17 October 2019 diff hist 0 m Ticinosuchus Fixed an obvious typo of "Ticinosuchus".
19 January 2019
- 07:2307:23, 19 January 2019 diff hist +1 m Christ myth theory A minor typo correction, "on" was changed to "one".
8 January 2019
- 14:5214:52, 8 January 2019 diff hist +178 User talk:Transcendent28 No edit summary
- 14:4114:41, 8 January 2019 diff hist +317 User talk:Transcendent28 No edit summary
6 January 2019
- 13:0813:08, 6 January 2019 diff hist +116 m User talk:Transcendent28 No edit summary
- 13:0713:07, 6 January 2019 diff hist +29 User talk:Transcendent28 I edited my unblock request message.
- 13:0513:05, 6 January 2019 diff hist +60 User talk:Transcendent28 No edit summary
- 12:4812:48, 6 January 2019 diff hist −1 m User talk:Transcendent28 No edit summary
- 12:4812:48, 6 January 2019 diff hist +314 User talk:Transcendent28 No edit summary
5 January 2019
- 21:3121:31, 5 January 2019 diff hist +788 User talk:Transcendent28 Further explanation.
- 21:1721:17, 5 January 2019 diff hist 0 m User talk:Transcendent28 No edit summary
- 21:1621:16, 5 January 2019 diff hist +1 m User talk:Transcendent28 No edit summary
- 21:1521:15, 5 January 2019 diff hist +431 User talk:Transcendent28 No edit summary
- 20:3120:31, 5 January 2019 diff hist +780 User talk:Transcendent28 Explanation of my request.
- 14:0214:02, 5 January 2019 diff hist +747 User talk:Transcendent28 Unblock request 2
- 13:3513:35, 5 January 2019 diff hist +252 m User talk:Transcendent28 No edit summary
- 13:2713:27, 5 January 2019 diff hist +348 m User talk:Transcendent28 No edit summary
- 12:5912:59, 5 January 2019 diff hist +1 m User talk:Transcendent28 No edit summary
- 12:5812:58, 5 January 2019 diff hist +1,457 User talk:Transcendent28 Confirming my non-racist outlook.
- 12:3912:39, 5 January 2019 diff hist +106 m User talk:Transcendent28 No edit summary
- 12:3912:39, 5 January 2019 diff hist +579 User talk:Transcendent28 Disagreeing with White privilege is not racist.
- 12:1312:13, 5 January 2019 diff hist +20 m User talk:Transcendent28 Unblock request.
1 January 2019
- 22:2422:24, 1 January 2019 diff hist +436 User talk:Transcendent28 Unblock request, sorry for the disruption.
31 December 2018
- 21:0721:07, 31 December 2018 diff hist −95,440 m White privilege ←Replaced content with '== The myth of "White privilege" == The cultural Marxist myth of "White privilege" was shown for the nonsense it is, when America elected it's first Preside...' Tag: Replaced
- 21:0021:00, 31 December 2018 diff hist 0 m Talk:White privilege No edit summary
- 20:5920:59, 31 December 2018 diff hist +1,985 Talk:White privilege The myth of "White privilege"
4 November 2018
- 14:2414:24, 4 November 2018 diff hist +178 m User talk:Transcendent28 No edit summary
- 14:2314:23, 4 November 2018 diff hist +5 User talk:Transcendent28 No edit summary
- 13:0813:08, 4 November 2018 diff hist +641 User talk:Doug Weller My argument.
- 12:3912:39, 4 November 2018 diff hist +507 User talk:Doug Weller I have stopped "edit warring", so stop the sanction threats please.
- 08:5108:51, 4 November 2018 diff hist +3,037 Talk:Alt-right The Alt-left section is not politically neutral.
- 06:5606:56, 4 November 2018 diff hist +47 m Alt-right →"Alt-left" neologism
- 06:4706:47, 4 November 2018 diff hist +1,241 User talk:Fortuna imperatrix mundi The Alt-right quotation marks explained.
- 06:4206:42, 4 November 2018 diff hist −4 Alt-right Undid revision 867080993 by Serial Number 54129 (talk) Yes, it changes the sense of it. It makes it a neutral statement rather than a biased one. Wether or not it's a "false" equivalence is a matter of opinion, not fact. If you use the smear "Alt left" then you possibly believe in the equivalence you are making between the far left and far right, in terms of political violence. Tag: Undo
3 November 2018
- 14:4114:41, 3 November 2018 diff hist −4 Alt-right I removed the first instance of "false" to keep the page politically neutral. It is a matter of opinion as to whether or not a smear is false or true. I put quotation marks round the second "false equivalence", as it is an attributed quote.
- 14:3614:36, 3 November 2018 diff hist +3 User talk:Girth Summit →The Alt-right page
- 14:3414:34, 3 November 2018 diff hist +998 User talk:Girth Summit →The Alt-right page
- 10:2310:23, 3 November 2018 diff hist +1,241 User talk:Girth Summit Explanation of my minor edit to the Alt-right page.
- 10:0910:09, 3 November 2018 diff hist +4 Alt-right Undid revision 866909275 by Girth Summit (talk) Tag: Undo
2 November 2018
- 10:2310:23, 2 November 2018 diff hist +4 m Alt-right "False equivalence" should be in quotation marks. The term "Alt-left" is used conservatives and the far-right, to smear their opponents - progressives and the far-left, by implying that they're equivalent to the "Alt-right" in terms of violence. Whether or not you agree with this implied equivalence between the far-right and far-left, is a matter of opinion. In this case, it's the quoted opinion of Mark Pitcavage. Thus his opinion should be in quotation marks, to keep this all neutral.
30 October 2018
- 07:4007:40, 30 October 2018 diff hist −14 m Alt-right The term "Alt-left" does not imply a "False equivalence" to the Alt-right. It implies an ACTUAL equivalence...which is why the term was being used. You may think it is "false" to claim such an equivalence, but the use of the term "Alt-left" does not intend it to be false. It's an smear term for violent leftist groups, implying they are equally violent to the Alt-right eg. "violence on many sides".
2 July 2018
- 11:5011:50, 2 July 2018 diff hist +7 m Lagomorpha A minor grammar correction.
29 June 2018
- 06:3006:30, 29 June 2018 diff hist −7 m British National Party No edit summary
- 06:2806:28, 29 June 2018 diff hist +27 m British National Party No citation.
26 June 2018
- 02:3902:39, 26 June 2018 diff hist 0 m Pliosauroidea No edit summary
- 02:3802:38, 26 June 2018 diff hist −1 Pliosauroidea I removed false information about Pliosaurs being "distant cousins of turtles". While this is sort of true, they were less related to turtles than dinosaurs were. Genetic evidence now shows that Turtles were from a branch of Archelosauria, and not ancestral to sauropterygian swimming reptiles, such as plesiosaurs and pliosaurs.
20 April 2018
- 02:0802:08, 20 April 2018 diff hist 0 m Slasher film →Silver Age of Slasher Films: I fixed another typo in another "million".
- 01:3201:32, 20 April 2018 diff hist +1 m Slasher film →1981: I corrected a typo in the word "million"